COMMUNITY VOICES 04/12/2009
 

LOS ANGELES PUBLIC INTEREST LAW JOURNAL


1 L.A. PUB. INT. L.J. 344


Table of Contents

Download PDF


INAUGURAL LOYOLA LAW
SCHOOL SOCIAL JUSTICE LECTURE (TRANSCRIPT)
*
Julie A. Su

          When I started law school, I was told I would be taught “to think like a lawyer.” I thought thinking like a lawyer meant I would be able to use laws to challenge barriers to a just world.

          It turned out that—at least it felt this way at the time—very little about law school seemed to be about that at all. I felt increasingly alienated as I came to realize that “thinking like a lawyer” meant suppressing and rejecting not just much of what was important to me, but much of who I was. “Thinking like a lawyer,” it appeared, meant that I would have to think less and less like a human being.

          Though I did not know any lawyers and knew little about the law when I got to law school, I did know how to be a translator. Like so many children of immigrants, I grew up translating for my parents: making phone calls, writing letters, and trying to navigate the adult world and adult interactions. I pursued law school because I grew increasingly aware that law is really a language—and those who speak it get to decide who gets what in our society: who gets protected and who does not; who is a citizen and who is not; who can get married and who cannot; who pays to keep our economy going and who does not. Growing up, I had seen how language serves to keep certain people at the margins of society; the law is similar. I went to law school to gain the tools to become a translator of the law for people who were disenfranchised, discriminated against, and exploited.

* For complete transcript, please download the PDF.


 

    RSS Feed



    Author

    Litigation Director, Asian Pacific American Legal Center, J.D. Harvard Law School 1994. Ms. Su gave this lecture at Loyola Law School on October 17, 2007.